Requiem at Rogano Read online

  Stephen Knight

  REQUIEM AT ROGANO

  with a new introduction by

  BERNARD TAYLOR

  VALANCOURT BOOKS

  Dedication: For my dear friend David Newnham

  Requiem at Rogano by Stephen Knight

  First published by Eyre Methuen, London, 1979

  This edition first published 2017

  Copyright © 1979 by Stephen Knight

  Introduction copyright © 2017 by Bernard Taylor

  All rights reserved. In accordance with the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976, the copying, scanning, uploading, and/or electronic sharing of any part of this book without the permission of the publisher constitutes unlawful piracy and theft of the author’s intellectual property. If you would like to use material from the book (other than for review purposes), prior written permission must be obtained by contacting the publisher.

  Published by Valancourt Books, Richmond, Virginia

  http://www.valancourtbooks.com

  Cover by Henry Petrides

  INTRODUCTION

  Requiem at Rogano was Stephen Knight’s only novel, though there can be no doubt that had his life not been cut so tragically short—at the age of 33—he would have gone on to write many more compelling stories.

  He first came to the reading public’s attention with his book on the London serial killer known as Jack the Ripper. His book, entitled Jack the Ripper: The Final Solution, was yet one more ‘answer’ to the mystery of the identity of England’s most notorious serial killer, a man who, over just a few weeks in 1888, slaughtered a number of women—mostly prostitutes—in the East End of London. He was never caught.

  Stephen’s revelations as to the supposed identity of the murderer, and of the motive for the killings, were something quite new, and were taken very seriously by many readers—the interest­ leading to huge sales of his book. It was his belief and startling revelation that the secretive association of the Freemasons was deeply involved in the murders and, further, that their involvement was instrumental in the crimes remaining ‘unsolved’—in effect, that there was a cover-up to prevent the exposure of the killer’s identity.

  Ever the delver for truth, Stephen’s fascination with research and discovery and its promised prizes was further illustrated with his book The Killing of Justice Godfrey, a detailed investigation into a 17th-century murder that had never been solved.

  Whilst working on his first book, about the Ripper, Stephen’s day job was as a drama critic for a south-London newspaper, and he and I met in 1976 when he came to review a production of a play that I had written. We became close friends, and remained so up to the time of his death from a brain tumor in 1985.

  And not only were we friends, but eventually we became collaborators. Some months before his death we began to work together on a book, a collection of unsolved murders that had taken place over the span of a hundred years or so. Sadly, Stephen died shortly before our work together was finished, and I completed the project on my own. How proud he would have been when, some months later, our book, Perfect Murder, won England’s top true crime award for that year.

  I have written the above to give some idea of Stephen’s fascination with the dark past, for so much of it came to be explored and come to fruition in his novel Requiem at Rogano. Indeed, it underlays the whole thing. And those familiar with his non-fiction works will see and appreciate how he was drawn to the enduring mysteries of the past.

  Requiem, it has to be said, is a densely plotted tale, with many characters playing vital and not so vital parts in it. And what an ambitious tale it is, and certainly one to keep the reader on his toes.

  Set in 1902 in London at the beginning of the Edwardian era, it takes for its theme the search for a serial killer who is not unlike the famous Jack the Ripper. But where Jack haunted the streets of East London’s Whitechapel district, Requiem has a backdrop of the city’s south-east district of Deptford—that area that has gone down in history as the spot where, in 1593, twenty-nine-year-old playwright and poet Christopher Marlowe was stabbed to death following a meal at an inn. Although the great Marlowe has no part in Requiem’s plot, I cannot help but think that he was there in Stephen’s mind when he chose this banal riverside district of London as one of his major settings.

  For it is there that the Deptford Strangler, as he is named in the novel’s newspapers, sets about his deathly business. However, whereas the infamous Jack is believed to have targeted only women, the Deptford Strangler casts a wider net—murdering both women and men. Moreover, where Jack’s victims were, as noted, generally believed to have all been prostitutes, the Deptford Strangler’s victims are from a broad field, so that on the surface they seem to have no connection—a factor that works against the discovery of a motive.

  There are two protagonists in the intricate story: Brough, a newly-retired Scotland Yard detective—who finds that retirement doesn’t suit him—and his nephew Nicholas. And, rather as in my working relationship with Stephen, the younger man suggests to the older that they collaborate, to write a book on true crime. However, whereas Stephen and I were selective in our choice of a small number of unsolved murders to investigate, Nicholas and his uncle decide to collaborate on a history of murder—a monumental task by anyone’s reckoning.

  And no, they don’t get into the actual business of writing of any such history (who could?) but quickly get side-tracked into looking at a series of mysterious murders that took place in the fictitious Italian town of Rogano—murders that had occurred some 500 years earlier and, so it is claimed, had remained unsolved.

  A murder that is unsolved will usually be of greater interest than one that leaves no questions, no mystery, and as we might expect, Brough and Nicholas, hooked, cast aside their monumental project of a history of murder and set out in pursuit of answers to the Rogano killings.

  This, then, would present to the reader an excellent plot for a riveting story. But Stephen is not content with that. He has more up his sleeve. There is, as we come to discover, far more to the story than a tale of two men researching a series of unsolved murders. It isn’t long before their investigations take them out of the everyday and into realms undreamed of, where, untutored, they find themselves deep in the mysteries of the occult—and, terrifyingly, discover that they themselves are a part of the story.

  I cannot liken Requiem at Rogano to any other work of fiction that I am familiar with. It stands alone, and with its unsettling mysteries and astonishing answers waits to be discovered again by a new generation of readers.

  Bernard Taylor

  Bernard Taylor is a former winner of the Crime Writers’ Association Gold Dagger Award for his collaboration with Stephen Knight on Perfect Murder. The author of several acclaimed true crime books, he has also written a number of horror and suspense novels, three of which—The Godsend, Sweetheart, Sweetheart, and The Moorstone Sickness—have been published by Valancourt Books.

  THANK YOU: David Richardson, Andrew Hewson, Anna Cooper, Leonard Knight, Adrian Knight, John Wilding, Bernard Taylor, Bob Woodings, Chris Hollifield, Kate Medina, Peter Jeffery, Nigel Coombs, David and Mary Pownall. Thank you, especially, Margot Kenrick, my most loving wife.

  1

  Retirement, thought ex-inspector Brough, is all very well if your heart is in it. He settled himself into his favorite fireside chair and looked out at the mist creeping slowly up from the Thames. The cabs rattling along Jermyn Street already looked indistinct and spectral in the December dusk.

  An early edition of the Star lay open on his lap. “Fourth Man Strangled by Mystery Assassin” declared a headline at the top of the page.

  Brough reached for his pipe and began to fill it.

  “A university professor done to death in Camd
en Passage, the Yard running around in circles not knowing who to arrest next, and me sitting here sinking into my dotage,” he muttered. “It just doesn’t make sense.”

  Brough had been melancholy and shiftless for more than a month, ever since the strangler’s first appearance at Deptford had sent the press into hysterics and the Yard into confusion.

  My brain is as sharp as it ever was, he thought. But the great god Regulations is not concerned with brains.

  Daily physical jerks and a few Sufi exercises learned during his army days in India kept his body as sound as his mind. He was as fit now as when he had taken over the metropolitan murder division of the CID back in ’91.

  But Regulations said an officer must retire at sixty, and no one—not even the commissioner—could defy Regulations. When, on the threshold of retirement, its depressing reality had at last become plain to him, he had tried hard to bend a few rules. But it was hopeless. He might just as well have sought the Holy Grail in the men’s locker room. On his sixtieth birthday, not a day sooner or later, the ax had fallen.

  Oh, he had tried to make the best of it. He had tried to tell himself that detective work was just another way of saying donkey work. And, to a point, that was true. Every startling solution that hit the headlines, every dramatic arrest, was the product of weeks or months of often tedious legwork.

  Donkey work, legwork, bloody hard work.

  But it was hopeless. All those arguments appealed to the mind. They didn’t really touch him.

  How could they? Reginald Arthur Brough had never troubled about hard work. He had savored every moment of it. In twenty- six years with the uniformed branch and eleven with the Detective Department he had earned the reputation of being one of the most single-minded men at the Yard. And donkey work or not, no man on the force had relished his duty more than Brough.

  Never one to be defeated easily by misfortune, he had striven valiantly to fill the empty weeks and months of his retirement.

  But that hadn’t worked either. In eighteen months he had accomplished much of what he had imagined would take years. Since leaving the Yard in June of the previous year he had read the complete works of Mr. Dickens—apart from Bleak House, which he couldn’t begin to get his teeth into; he had endlessly haunted the Natural History Museum; and he had photographed the scene of almost every notorious murder that had ever taken place in his beloved London. He had trudged from the splendid Kensington mews where Mrs. Cheyney-Loring had met her comeuppance in the shape of Spider Bill (to whom she had been married for twelve years without suspecting his identity) to the very house where the horrible Ratcliffe Highway murders had been committed, and he had taken hundreds of pictures en route. The sepia prints now occupied every inch of space on the walls, and, together with a formidable array of gruesome knick-knacks from a lifetime spent chasing criminals, they turned his gaslit rooms into a veritable museum of murder. He looked around him. Between the books and the murderers’ bric-a-brac, strange Buddhist gods peered at him out of the shadows. He dropped his gaze to his hands and ran his eye along the crease that the palmists called the life line. How far have I traveled along it? he pondered. I see its beginning. And its end. And all its tributaries. But whereabouts is now?

  God, how he ached to be back on the job. Other men, not yet sixty, nudged him in the ribs and chortled about the freedom of retirement. Well, they could have it. The only freedom he wanted was about the only freedom he couldn’t have. Freedom, real freedom—carte blanche—to set up the machinery to snare this bastard strangler.

  But what use were dreams? Sitting there alone in the flickering firelight of his rooms, he felt adrift like a dinghy that had broken its moorings. Botany, reading and amateur photography never had and never would replace the thrill of the chase. And learned men getting strangled in dark alleys miles from where they lived aggravated his dissatisfaction with life.

  Such incidents made him yearn to wind back the clock and show these youngsters with three stripes on their arms before they were thirty how a criminal investigation should be handled. Dreams again. Empty, useless dreams.

  Now with a little woman beside me, he reflected, I wouldn’t feel so cut off from life. I wouldn’t feel the need to fill my days with so much doing. Just being would be a fine thing.

  He yawned. Troubled nights for the past few weeks had added to his misery.

  He looked again at the unopened letter lying on the table by a plaster bust of his old sparring partner Charles Peace. It had arrived with the second post, but he had been so involved in developing some photographs that he had had no time to open it. Later, when the prints were hanging up to dry in his makeshift darkroom, he had been too immersed in mourning his lost past to give it a thought. Rising, Brough picked up the letter, walked to the window and opened it.

  Grand Hotel de New-York

  Palazzo Ricasoli

  Florence

  29 NOV 1902

  R. A. Brough, Esq.

  35a Jermyn Street

  London W.

  My Dear Uncle,

  Forgive my using the typewriter, which at best seems cold and impersonal, but in three years of newspaper work my handwriting ability seems to have atrophied.

  Journalism is a pretty precarious existence, as you warned me it would be—more so when you sell what you can on the open market rather than buckle down to an eight-to-seven drudgery with a regular employer. There’s not a great deal more to be made writing books, as I found with King Teddy, but the odd literary venture does swell the coffers a bit. And perhaps more importantly it helps me keep my hand in with the king’s English, which my twopence-a-lining for the dailies rather abuses. As an indignant professor of English told me before I came down from Oxford, any similarity between journalese and the English language is purely coincidental!

  I know Teddy wasn’t the hottest seller of the year, but it did moderately well and I have enough confidence to think my style will improve with experience, so I’ve decided to start work on another book.

  How does the idea of collaborating with me on a History of Murder appeal to you? I realize I have been rather aloof of late and I must have seemed ungracious in my neglect of our old friendship, but life takes some queer twists and the course of our existence is so often outside our control, as you have told me often. No matter. I shall be lodging with my parents for the foreseeable future when I return home and for my part I should dearly love to revive our old association. And after a year and a half of forced inactivity you must long to get your teeth into something challenging and fulfilling. You might be out for the count as far as new cases are concerned, but who better than a man of your experience to tackle a proper account of the great murders of the past—and to have a crack at clearing up a few of the unsolved ones? Writers with no training in detection are producing books every year with ingenious and widely discussed theories on old mysteries from the identity of the man who wrote Shakespeare’s plays to the riddle of the little princes in the Tower. Andrew Lang has made a career out of mystery.

  As far as I can discover there has been no well-researched history of murder from the earliest times to the present day, and old Harris at Methuen & Co. thinks there could be a good market for it. Not knowing my plan to ask you to collaborate with me, Harris suggested that a foreword from you would give the book a sort of imprimatur. Imagine how the reading public will sit up and take note if the title page is inscribed “By Former Scotland Yard Inspector Reginald Brough. . . .”

  I thought we could start with Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus, who was clubbed to death in the Roman senate in 133 B.C., and document every notable murder that’s been committed since—reporting facts, commenting, and where possible offering new explanations for stubborn mysteries. I have already done six months’ work on a synopsis and I’ve been digging into some pretty bizarre cases.

  I have stumbled on one case the like of which you’ve never seen. It must beat anything they ever handed you at the Yard. That’s really why I am in Italy. If we can get
to the bottom of this one it will be the highlight of the book.

  I still have a lot to do here but I expect to be back in London by Wednesday, December 10th, at the latest. If I don’t contact you before, I shall be at the Beggar’s on Thursday the 11th at six if you should care to join me.

  With great affection

  Your nephew

  Nicholas

  P.S. I’m not staying at the Hotel de New-York. I just nipped in for a cup of tea and to pinch some stationery.

  Nicholas Calvin. My God, it must be nearly two years.

  Before Oxford, Nicholas had been Brough’s companion through many long evenings. They shared a number of interests, notably the detection of crime, and each enjoyed listening to the other expound on his own subjects. Despite the thirty-odd years that separated them in age, a warm friendship had grown up between them. Nicholas was the only son of Brough’s sister Alice, so the old man had known his friend almost since he had drawn his first breath.

  There had been a grand reunion when Nicholas came down from university and another a short time later when his biography of the new king was published, but since then nothing. Brough was not so unsympathetic as Nicholas seemed to fear. He had treasured their friendship, but for at least four years before it ran down he had expected his place in his nephew’s affections to be replaced, quite properly, by the tenderer charms of a young woman. As far as the old man knew, no serious love had as yet materialized. Doubtless there had been mistresses, but the lady in Nicholas’ life had turned out to be his work, and Brough no more resented that than he would have resented a woman.

  The letter had taken nearly a fortnight to arrive, and by Nicholas’ calculations he would have arrived home last night.